{"id":155,"date":"2026-06-26T04:56:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-26T04:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/?p=155"},"modified":"2026-05-26T04:58:03","modified_gmt":"2026-05-26T04:58:03","slug":"neck-disability-index-scoring-interpretation-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/2026\/06\/26\/neck-disability-index-scoring-interpretation-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"Neck Disability Index: Complete Scoring and Interpretation Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Quick answer:<\/strong> Sum the scores from all 10 NDI sections (each 0\u20135), divide by 50, multiply by 100 for a percentage. Score 0\u20138%: no disability. 9\u201328%: mild. 29\u201348%: moderate. 49\u201364%: severe. 65\u201380%: complete disability. 81\u2013100%: exaggerating or bed-bound. MCID is 10 points (raw) for mechanical neck pain and 13 points for cervical radiculopathy. Use our <a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/neck-disability-index\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">free NDI calculator<\/a> for instant scoring and documentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Is the Neck Disability Index?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is the most widely used patient-reported outcome measure for quantifying disability caused by neck pain. It was developed by Howard Vernon and Shawn Mior in 1991 as a modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index, with permission from the original author (J. Fairbank, 1980). Vernon and Mior published validation data in the <em>Journal of Manipulative and Physiologic Therapeutics<\/em> in 1991, establishing strong reliability (Pearson&#8217;s r = 0.89, p \u2264 0.05) and internal consistency (Cronbach&#8217;s alpha = 0.80).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The NDI captures how neck pain affects ten specific areas of daily functioning. Unlike clinician-administered assessments, the NDI is self-reported \u2014 the patient completes it independently, eliminating interviewer bias and taking approximately 5 minutes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Appropriate Clinical Populations<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Acute, subacute, and chronic mechanical neck pain<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cervical radiculopathy (C3\u2013C8)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whiplash associated disorders (WAD Grade I\u2013III)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cervicogenic headache<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Post-cervical spine surgery outcomes<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Work-related neck injuries and medicolegal assessments<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When Not to Use the NDI<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The NDI is specific to the cervical spine. For lumbar spine disability, use the <a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/oswestry-disability-index\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Oswestry Disability Index<\/a>. For shoulder pathology, use the <a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/spadi-score\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">SPADI<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/quickdash-questionnaire\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">QuickDASH<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">All 10 NDI Sections \u2014 What Each Measures<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Each section presents six statements describing increasing levels of disability, scored 0 (no disability) to 5 (maximum disability). The patient selects the single statement that best describes their situation over the past week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>#<\/th><th>Section<\/th><th>What it captures<\/th><th>Score range<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>1<\/strong><\/td><td>Pain Intensity<\/td><td>Current pain level and effect on analgesic use<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>2<\/strong><\/td><td>Personal Care<\/td><td>Ability to wash, dress, and maintain self-care<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>3<\/strong><\/td><td>Lifting<\/td><td>Capacity to lift objects and pain associated with lifting<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>4<\/strong><\/td><td>Reading<\/td><td>Ability to read with comfortable head position<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>5<\/strong><\/td><td>Headaches<\/td><td>Headache frequency and intensity related to neck pain<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>6<\/strong><\/td><td>Concentration<\/td><td>Ability to concentrate when desired<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>7<\/strong><\/td><td>Work<\/td><td>Ability to perform work or daily activities<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>8<\/strong><\/td><td>Driving<\/td><td>Ability to drive and pain associated with driving<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>9<\/strong><\/td><td>Sleeping<\/td><td>Quality of sleep affected by neck pain<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>10<\/strong><\/td><td>Recreation<\/td><td>Participation in recreational activities<\/td><td>0\u20135<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Important \u2014 Sections 4 (Reading) and 8 (Driving):<\/strong> These are the two sections most commonly left incomplete. If a patient does not drive or does not read regularly, they may skip Section 8 or Section 4. Use the adjusted formula (see below) if any section is incomplete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to Calculate the NDI Score \u2014 Step by Step<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Standard Formula \u2014 All 10 Sections Completed<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Raw score:<\/strong> Add all 10 section scores (0\u201350 total)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Percentage:<\/strong> (Raw score \u00f7 50) \u00d7 100<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Example:<\/strong> Patient scores: 3+2+4+3+2+3+4+2+3+2 = 28 raw<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">NDI % = (28 \u00f7 50) \u00d7 100 = <strong>56% \u2014 Severe disability<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Adjusted Formula \u2014 One Section Incomplete<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If exactly one section is not answered:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Percentage:<\/strong> (Raw score \u00f7 45) \u00d7 100<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Adjusted Formula \u2014 Two Sections Incomplete<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If exactly two sections are not answered:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Percentage:<\/strong> (Raw score \u00f7 40) \u00d7 100<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Rule:<\/strong> If more than two sections are incomplete, the questionnaire is considered invalid and should be readministered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Alternatively \u2014 Raw Score Only<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The NDI can be interpreted as a raw score (0\u201350) rather than a percentage. Both methods are valid and clinically accepted. If using raw scores for MCID calculations, ensure you are comparing raw-to-raw (not raw-to-percentage).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">NDI Score Interpretation \u2014 Disability Classifications<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>NDI Score (%)<\/th><th>Raw Score<\/th><th>Disability Category<\/th><th>Clinical description<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>0\u20138%<\/strong><\/td><td>0\u20134<\/td><td>No disability<\/td><td>Minimal functional limitation. Pain present but does not meaningfully restrict daily activities.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>9\u201328%<\/strong><\/td><td>5\u201314<\/td><td>Mild disability<\/td><td>Pain is primary complaint. Patient manages most ADLs independently. Activities may take longer or require care.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>29\u201348%<\/strong><\/td><td>15\u201324<\/td><td>Moderate disability<\/td><td>Pain and disability significantly affect daily life. Work, recreation, and social participation impaired.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>49\u201364%<\/strong><\/td><td>25\u201332<\/td><td>Severe disability<\/td><td>Neck pain pervades all areas of life. Unable to work or engage in most recreational activities.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>65\u201380%<\/strong><\/td><td>33\u201340<\/td><td>Complete disability<\/td><td>Maximum disability \u2014 neck pain dominates all aspects of daily function.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>81\u2013100%<\/strong><\/td><td>41\u201350<\/td><td>Bed-bound or symptom exaggeration<\/td><td>Patient is either bed-bound from neck pain or symptoms appear inconsistent with presentation. Evaluate with Waddell signs and psychosocial screening.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">MCID \u2014 When Is a Score Change Clinically Meaningful?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is the smallest change in NDI score that patients perceive as meaningful improvement. The MCID differs by clinical diagnosis \u2014 one of the most important and most commonly missed clinical distinctions with the NDI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Diagnosis<\/th><th>MCID (raw points)<\/th><th>MCID (%)<\/th><th>Source<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Mechanical neck pain<\/td><td>10 points<\/td><td>20%<\/td><td>Stratford et al., 1999<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Cervical radiculopathy<\/td><td>13 points<\/td><td>26%<\/td><td>Young et al., 2009<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Whiplash (WAD)<\/td><td>10 points<\/td><td>20%<\/td><td>Jorritsma et al., 2012<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Clinical application:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Patient with mechanical neck pain improves from raw 28 to raw 20 = 8-point change. <strong>Below MCID of 10.<\/strong> Cannot claim clinically meaningful improvement.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Patient with cervical radiculopathy improves from raw 34 to raw 20 = 14-point change. <strong>Exceeds MCID of 13.<\/strong> This is clinically meaningful improvement \u2014 document explicitly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Minimal Detectable Change (MDC90) is approximately 5 points for mechanical neck pain \u2014 meaning changes of 5 or fewer points are within measurement error. The MCID (10 points) is higher than the MDC, meaning a clinically meaningful change is also statistically reliable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Section-Level Analysis \u2014 What Low Scores Tell You<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Do not interpret the NDI as a single total score alone. The section-level profile reveals which functional domains are most impaired and directs treatment priorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>High-scoring section<\/th><th>Clinical implication<\/th><th>Treatment priority<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Section 4 (Reading)<\/td><td>Sustained cervical flexion intolerance \u2014 common in disc pathology<\/td><td>Cervical extension exercises, ergonomic education<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 5 (Headaches)<\/td><td>Cervicogenic headache component \u2014 upper cervical joint involvement<\/td><td>C1\u2013C3 manual therapy, suboccipital release<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 6 (Concentration)<\/td><td>Pain catastrophising or central sensitisation<\/td><td>Pain education, cognitive-behavioural approaches<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 8 (Driving)<\/td><td>Cervical rotation limitation \u2014 common in WAD and facet pathology<\/td><td>Rotation mobility work, mirror-based exercises<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 9 (Sleeping)<\/td><td>Nocturnal pain \u2014 inflammatory component or poor sleep positioning<\/td><td>Pillow assessment, nocturnal pain management<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">NDI vs Oswestry \u2014 Which for Which Patient<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Feature<\/th><th>NDI<\/th><th>Oswestry (ODI)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Region<\/strong><\/td><td>Cervical spine<\/td><td>Lumbar spine<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Sections<\/strong><\/td><td>10<\/td><td>10<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Max score<\/strong><\/td><td>50 (raw)<\/td><td>50 (raw)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>MCID<\/strong><\/td><td>10\u201313 points (diagnosis-dependent)<\/td><td>10\u201312.8 percentage points<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Unique sections vs ODI<\/strong><\/td><td>Reading, Headaches, Concentration, Driving<\/td><td>Lifting, Social Life, Travelling, Employment<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Unique to NDI<\/strong><\/td><td>Captures cognitive symptoms (headache, concentration)<\/td><td>Not applicable<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">SOAP Note Documentation Template<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Neck Disability Index (NDI) administered \u2014 patient self-completed. All 10 sections answered. Raw score: 24\/50. NDI percentage: 48% \u2014 upper end of Moderate disability category (29\u201348%). Highest scoring sections: Section 4 Reading (4\/5 \u2014 unable to read as long as desired), Section 8 Driving (4\/5 \u2014 cannot drive as long as desired), Section 5 Headaches (3\/5 \u2014 frequent headaches). Section profile indicates cervical rotation and sustained flexion intolerance with cervicogenic headache component.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">MCID for cervical radiculopathy (confirmed diagnosis): 13 raw points (Young et al., 2009). A minimum 13-point raw score improvement is required to demonstrate clinically meaningful functional change. Baseline established for outcomes tracking. Reassess NDI in 4 weeks following manual therapy and cervical stabilisation programme.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Free NDI Calculator<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our <a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/neck-disability-index\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">free Neck Disability Index calculator<\/a> scores all 10 sections, calculates percentage, classifies disability level, displays diagnosis-specific MCID thresholds, and generates EMR-ready documentation. No login required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/neck-disability-index\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u2192 Open the free NDI Calculator<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Related Calculators<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/oswestry-disability-index\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Oswestry Disability Index \u2014 lumbar spine equivalent of the NDI<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/spadi-score\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">SPADI \u2014 shoulder pain and disability assessment<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/quickdash-questionnaire\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">QuickDASH \u2014 upper extremity disability including cervical components<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How do you calculate the Neck Disability Index percentage?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Add all 10 section scores (each 0\u20135) for a raw total out of 50. Divide by 50 and multiply by 100 to get a percentage. If one section is incomplete, divide by 45. If two sections are incomplete, divide by 40. More than two incomplete sections invalidates the questionnaire.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What is the MCID for the NDI?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The MCID is 10 raw points (20%) for mechanical neck pain and 13 raw points (26%) for cervical radiculopathy. Always match the MCID to the patient&#8217;s confirmed diagnosis \u2014 using the wrong threshold will lead to incorrect conclusions about treatment effectiveness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What is a normal NDI score?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A score of 0\u20138% (raw 0\u20134) indicates no disability \u2014 neck pain is present but does not meaningfully restrict daily activities. Population studies of people without neck pain report mean NDI scores of approximately 4\u20138%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Can the NDI be used for cervical myelopathy?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The NDI was not specifically validated for cervical myelopathy. The Myelopathy Disability Index (MDI) or Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score are more appropriate for myelopathic presentations. The NDI may still be used as one component of a broader outcome measure battery in myelopathy patients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What is the difference between NDI and PSFS?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The NDI is a standardised fixed questionnaire \u2014 same 10 sections for every patient. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is individualised \u2014 the patient identifies their own 3\u20135 most important functional limitations. Both are valid; NDI allows comparison across patients, PSFS captures individual patient priorities. Many clinicians use both together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">References<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: A study of reliability and validity. <em>J Manipulative Physiol Ther.<\/em> 1991;14(7):409-415. PMID: 1834753.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Binkley JM, et al. Using the Neck Disability Index to make decisions concerning individual patients. <em>Physiother Can.<\/em> 1999;2:107-112.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Young IA, Cleland JA, Michener LA, Brown C. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. <em>Am J Phys Med Rehabil.<\/em> 2010;89(10):831-839. PMID: 20736826.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. <em>Arch Phys Med Rehabil.<\/em> 2008;89(1):69-74. PMID: 18164333.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, et al. Measurement properties of the Neck Disability Index: a systematic review. <em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.<\/em> 2009;39(5):400-417. PMID: 19411761.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Written by Nikhil Mahajan, PT, MPT | Last reviewed: June 2026 | <a href=\"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/physical-therapy\/neck-disability-index\">Free NDI Calculator \u2192<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quick answer: Sum the scores from all 10 NDI sections (each 0\u20135), divide by 50, multiply by 100 for a percentage. Score 0\u20138%: no disability. 9\u201328%: mild. 29\u201348%: moderate. 49\u201364%: severe. 65\u201380%: complete disability. 81\u2013100%: exaggerating or bed-bound. MCID is 10 points (raw) for mechanical neck pain and 13 points for cervical radiculopathy. Use our&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-155","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-calculator"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":156,"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155\/revisions\/156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicalcalculatorhub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}