Oral Hygiene · Periodontics · Silness-Löe 1964 · Clinical Assessment

Plaque Index Calculator

Silness-Löe Plaque Index with 0–3 scoring criteria for all tooth surfaces. Score 6 Ramfjord index teeth or full dentition, calculate mean plaque index, classify oral hygiene status, and generate clinical documentation.

NM Clinically reviewed byDr. Nikhil Mahajan, PT, MPT  ·  Jan 15, 2026
0ExcellentNo plaque
|
0.1–0.9GoodMinimal plaque
|
1.0–1.9FairNeeds improvement
|
2.0–3.0PoorPoor oral hygiene
|
<1.0Treatment GoalTarget PI after OHI
Surfaces Scored0
Total Score0
Mean PI0.00
StatusExcellent
Scoring protocol
Score each surface — 4 surfaces per tooth (Mesial, Distal, Buccal, Lingual)
3
UR 1st Molar ISO #16
Mesial
Distal
Buccal
Lingual
9
UL Cen. Incisor ISO #21
Mesial
Distal
Buccal
Lingual
12
UL 1st Premolar ISO #24
Mesial
Distal
Buccal
Lingual
19
LL 1st Molar ISO #36
Mesial
Distal
Buccal
Lingual
25
LL Cen. Incisor ISO #41
Mesial
Distal
Buccal
Lingual
28
LR 1st Premolar ISO #44
Mesial
Distal
Buccal
Lingual

Silness-Löe Plaque Index — Scoring Criteria Reference

ScoreCriteriaDetection methodClinical significance
0 No plaque No plaque on probe No plaque present — ideal
1 Film of plaque Run probe along margin — plaque visible on tip No plaque present — ideal
2 Moderate plaque Visible to naked eye No plaque present — ideal
3 Abundant plaque Visible to naked eye No plaque present — ideal

Mean Plaque Index — Classification and Clinical Response

Mean PIClassificationRecall intervalClinical action
0Excellent12 monthsPositive reinforcement, maintenance
0.1–0.9Good6–12 monthsOral hygiene reinforcement, fluoride
1.0–1.9Fair3–6 monthsOHI + professional polishing; identify problem areas
2.0–3.0Poor3 monthsIntensive OHI, scaling, caries risk assessment; CAMBRA if indicated

Plaque Index: Clinical Guide for Dental Professionals

The Plaque Index (PI) was developed by Silness and Löe in 1964 as a method for assessing the thickness of plaque at the gingival margin in clinical trials and patient monitoring. Unlike indices that measure plaque extent (area), the Silness-Löe PI measures plaque thickness — particularly the soft deposit in the gingival crevice that causes gingivitis.

The Ramfjord Index Teeth Protocol

In epidemiological surveys, scoring is commonly limited to the six Ramfjord index teeth — teeth #3, #9, #12, #19, #25, #28 (universal numbering) — chosen to represent all regions of the dentition. Each of the four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual) is scored 0–3. The mean score across all 24 surfaces (6 teeth × 4 surfaces) gives the mean plaque index. This protocol reduces assessment time while maintaining statistical validity for population comparisons.

Relationship Between Plaque Index and Gingival Health

Löe and Silness demonstrated a strong correlation (r = 0.84) between the Plaque Index and the Gingival Index — higher plaque scores consistently predicted higher gingival inflammation scores. A mean PI below 1.0 is associated with clinical gingival health in most populations. A PI above 2.0 is consistently associated with generalised gingivitis and elevated risk of periodontitis progression.

NM
Dr. Nikhil Mahajan, PT, MPT Reviewed January 15, 2026 · View credentials

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the Silness-Löe plaque index scores 0, 1, 2, and 3?
0 = No plaque. 1 = Thin film at gingival margin, visible only by running a probe along the tooth surface. 2 = Moderate accumulation visible to the naked eye at the gingival margin and in the gingival pocket. 3 = Abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and on the gingival margin and tooth surface.
How is the mean plaque index calculated?
Sum the scores from all surfaces assessed. Divide by the total number of surfaces scored. For the 6 Ramfjord teeth protocol: sum of all 24 surface scores ÷ 24 = mean PI. For full dentition: sum of all surface scores ÷ total surfaces examined. The result ranges from 0 to 3.
What is the treatment goal for plaque index?
The clinical treatment goal is a mean Plaque Index of less than 1.0, which is associated with an absence of clinical gingivitis in most populations. In periodontal maintenance patients and implant patients, the goal is PI <0.5 to minimise peri-implant mucositis risk.